Comparison
DWARF mini vs Atlas Single
DWARF mini has the wider field (2.13° × 1.2° vs 1.78° × 1°), so it frames large targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy more easily; Atlas Single shows smaller objects at a larger scale. Of our 20 popular targets, DWARF mini frames 6 well and Atlas Single 6.
- Wider field: DWARF mini.
- Price: listed in different currencies ($419 vs €3,990); compare in your own market.
- Larger aperture: Atlas Single (80 mm), which gathers more light per exposure.
| Spec | DWARF mini | Atlas Single |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 30 mm | 80 mm |
| Focal length | – | 360 mm |
| Native field of view | 2.13° × 1.2° | 1.78° × 1° |
| Targets framed well | 6 / 20 | 6 / 20 |
| Weight | 0.84 kg | – |
| Wide-angle camera | Not listed | Yes |
| Mosaic mode | Not listed | Yes |
| Official price | $419 | €3,990 |
Both frames on the same targets
Solid gold: DWARF mini. Dashed blue: Atlas Single.
Where they differ
| Target | DWARF mini | Atlas Single |
|---|---|---|
| M42 Orion Nebula | fits well | larger than the frame |
| M63 Sunflower Galaxy | small in the frame | fits well |
Where to buy the DWARF mini
Where to buy the Atlas Single
Some of these are affiliate links: we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes our rankings. Prices and stock are on the retailer's page. Disclosure
Questions and answers
- Which is better for large targets, the DWARF mini or the Atlas Single?
- The DWARF mini, because it has the wider field of view.
- Which frames more popular targets well?
- Both frame 6 of our 20 popular targets well.