Comparison
DWARF mini vs Vespera 3
Vespera 3 has the wider field (2.5° × 1.4° vs 2.13° × 1.2°), so it frames large targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy more easily; DWARF mini shows smaller objects at a larger scale. Of our 20 popular targets, DWARF mini frames 6 well and Vespera 3 7.
- Wider field: Vespera 3.
- Price: listed in different currencies ($419 vs €2,490); compare in your own market.
- Lighter: DWARF mini (0.84 kg).
- Larger aperture: Vespera 3 (50 mm), which gathers more light per exposure.
| Spec | DWARF mini | Vespera 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 30 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal length | – | 245 mm |
| Native field of view | 2.13° × 1.2° | 2.5° × 1.4° |
| Targets framed well | 6 / 20 | 7 / 20 |
| Weight | 0.84 kg | 5 kg |
| Wide-angle camera | Not listed | Not listed |
| Mosaic mode | Not listed | Yes |
| Official price | $419 | €2,490 |
Both frames on the same targets
Solid gold: DWARF mini. Dashed blue: Vespera 3.
Where they differ
| Target | DWARF mini | Vespera 3 |
|---|---|---|
| M33 Triangulum Galaxy | larger than the frame | fits well |
Where to buy the DWARF mini
Where to buy the Vespera 3
Some of these are affiliate links: we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes our rankings. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and stock are on the retailer's page. Disclosure
Questions and answers
- Which is better for large targets, the DWARF mini or the Vespera 3?
- The Vespera 3, because it has the wider field of view.
- Which frames more popular targets well?
- The Vespera 3 (7 of 20, against 6).
- Which is lighter?
- The DWARF mini, at about 0.84 kg.