Comparison
DWARF 3 vs Vespera Pro 2
DWARF 3 has the wider field (2.93° × 1.65° vs 1.6° × 1.6°), so it frames large targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy more easily; Vespera Pro 2 shows smaller objects at a larger scale. Of our 20 popular targets, DWARF 3 frames 7 well and Vespera Pro 2 7.
- Wider field: DWARF 3.
- Price: listed in different currencies ($549 vs €2,990); compare in your own market.
- Lighter: DWARF 3 (1.35 kg).
- Larger aperture: Vespera Pro 2 (50 mm), which gathers more light per exposure.
| Spec | DWARF 3 | Vespera Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 35 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal length | 150 mm | 245 mm |
| Native field of view | 2.93° × 1.65° | 1.6° × 1.6° |
| Targets framed well | 7 / 20 | 7 / 20 |
| Weight | 1.35 kg | 5 kg |
| Wide-angle camera | Yes | Not listed |
| Mosaic mode | Not listed | Yes |
| Official price | $549 | €2,990 |
Both frames on the same targets
Solid gold: DWARF 3. Dashed blue: Vespera Pro 2.
Where to buy the DWARF 3
Where to buy the Vespera Pro 2
Some of these are affiliate links: we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes our rankings. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and stock are on the retailer's page. Disclosure
Questions and answers
- Which is better for large targets, the DWARF 3 or the Vespera Pro 2?
- The DWARF 3, because it has the wider field of view.
- Which frames more popular targets well?
- Both frame 7 of our 20 popular targets well.
- Which is lighter?
- The DWARF 3, at about 1.35 kg.