Learn · Sky

Light pollution and the Bortle scale

Light pollution brightens the sky background and adds noise, so faint objects need much more stacking time from a city than from a dark site. Bright nebulae and clusters still work well from town, especially with a dual-band filter; faint galaxies benefit most from darker skies.

What light pollution does to a photo

Street lights and buildings light up the air above a town. That glow lands on every pixel, on top of the light from the nebula. A stacking app can subtract the average glow, but not its noise: that randomness stays and hides faint detail. The only cures are more exposure time, a filter for the right kind of object, or a darker sky.

The Bortle scale

The Bortle scale rates night skies from 1 (truly dark, the Milky Way casts shadows) to 9 (inner city, only a few stars visible). Most people in Western Europe live under Bortle 6 to 8. Moving from Bortle 8 to Bortle 4 cuts the sky glow by more than ten times.

The same 30 minutes under four skies

City centre (Bortle 8)
Suburb (Bortle 6)
Countryside (Bortle 4)
Dark site (Bortle 2)

Loading the example…

Simulated with our photo simulator from a survey photo of the Orion Nebula, cropped to a Seestar S50-sized frame. Not taken with a smart telescope.

Every panel is a 30-minute stack without filter. Only the sky brightness changes.

When a filter helps

Emission nebulae glow in a few narrow colours (hydrogen-alpha and oxygen III). A dual-band filter passes those and blocks most of the sky glow, so it helps a lot from town. Galaxies, star clusters and reflection nebulae shine in all colours like the sky glow itself, so a filter cannot separate them. For those, darker skies and more time are the answer.

Getting the most from a city sky

Try it yourself →

More guides

The sky letter, once a month

About five days before each new moon: the best targets, the darkest nights and which telescope frames them. Free; unsubscribe any time.

We use your address only for this letter. Privacy · RSS